The enduring health and safety war is now reaching its latest phase. Already organisations like the HSe are showing signs of growing tired of the criticisms they face, which is why the HSE came out fighting last year, most famously to deny it was responsible for people not being allowed to sit on Henman Hill (or whatever it is currently known as). In 2012, there will be blood.
Prime Minister David Cameron has vowed to wage war against what he calls the ‘excessive health and safety culture’ in the UK. How this is resolved in 2012 will depend very much on how various stakeholders respond to the findings of last year’s Löfstedt Review. The report was carried out by Professor Ragnar Löfstedt of Kings College, who looked at 200 pieces of health and safety law. His recommendations will aim to simplifying and streamline existing regulations, focus enforcement on higher risk businesses, clarify obligations and rebalancing the civil litigation system. That all sounds great but there is concern about what it will all mean in practice.
The Institution of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH) responded to the review by claiming the Government’s views on health and safety could be problematic, especially by exempting smaller firms and the self-employed from legislation In its response ISOH says exempting from health? and safety law self-employed ?people whose jobs don’t pose a?risk to others is unnecessary and unhelpful – it’s a backward step and sends out the wrong message. It believes defining work in this way would be difficult, and could cause confusion to self-employed people and micro businesses. There isn’t long to discuss it, with a first stage deadline of June 2012, so this is another story that will run and run. All we know is that things will change significantly.
To read more health and safety related comments please click here.











